Gaon Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, a member of the Supreme Rabbinical Court in Jerusalem, one of the greatest of our generation, video, media reports from the meeting, some scholar, said the wig is a head covering from the outset and not after the fact. It goes to the question of the borrower “Most girls tend Israel kosher wig. It’s okay or not?”
The rabbi replied, “There wig she sang, and she did not kosher.” Again pressing the questioner, “It’s okay or not? This is the first place or not”? And was told, “There was once a great generation … When he came here to Israel, conditioned him and said to him, ‘And listen, Rabbi, Jerusalem did not go with a wig … he said, then I’m not going to Jerusalem, I will stay here. They agreed and came to Jerusalem with a wig. What, R. Içel live with a woman in retrospect? But the wig of his wife was kosher “(and at the end of his talk where he spoke against wigs are forbidden according to him, there’s hacks, and showed his hand on the place of laying tefillin, mirror on the longevity them Wigs prohibited).
A first segment of Rabbi Elyashiv here to see the rabbi said wigs that do not have similar recognition and transmission Firoa Prime prohibited! During its rate [A Cheshvan Tss”t] daily Maran RavElyashiv Tractate Shabbat, UPS added these “if you walk like a wild-prime as there are those who go – need to know that it is absolute no.” When one student asked whether this woman goes on Jewish religion and leave without written ?, responded positively RavElyashiv.
The first public reference and subject wearing wigs came from Maran RavElyashiv Monday night (Tishri Tss”t power) in the midst of the daily rate of RavElyashiv Tractate Shabbat (house of study “glory holes”) RavElyashiv said words to the participants in the class “Although there are differences of opinion whether right or wrong, but certainly if you go like wild-prime [ie, that it is impossible to distinguish epic wig, close-up] as there are those [not all women] who go – need to know that it is absolute no” RavElyashiv added: “It’s just like bush” [looks Conto read the SCC must not be against it, even though the wig revealed ministers to happen against (some say Shafi, also covered by the law), although since that seems wild Prime, already sees the wig bother Dsof end looks as Forest herself and the hair itself through to cover him], although the rabbi immediately went on to say “every question is if you are going to like the wig a hundred years ago [that although it was a natural gate but was visible in some ways it is not her hair connected] It is certainly permissible, and even a little nicer [Hence allowed wig to be nice] but that would be like going today; all those who go today “properly” It looks like her hair – surely this prohibition, [ie – the ban is only when looked wild Prime, and the problem is not because of beauty but because Appearances, who do not know it’s a wig] Such wigs no one allowed “one of the participants in the class asked the RavElyashiv,” Surely the time also been controversy “?
(And the rabbi replied) “Once there was a dispute” (borrower) Although there was significant that it was not her? (And the rabbi replied) “They argued that this decree, [that RavElyashiv understand that prohibit banned because there was a considerable thud first it was a wig, even the tiniest distinction was evident that is not going to repay the prime Because finally, could go wrong passers-by and be considered a wild head so prohibiting claimed to be cut out of it because appearances, and that permitting disagreed and said there was no cut], but at least it was evident [definition, Msa”c some wigs are now also recognize the distinction AA if it is unkempt head or wearing a wig, thinks Henry ” that of it there is no dispute must be prohibited, and CL of it because there is no discussion of cutting but these wigs are actually lewdness The same inconvenient heart.] “(the borrower) but Gemara means taking the cover of the woman herself and let her and it’s certainly better [= Beautiful] bad wigs [= beautiful] today? (And the rabbi replied) “I do not know what you’re talking about that was cut or not? [That is all I said was, some wigs of today can not be recognized if they toupee or hair woman right, namely that goes wild Prime, so I said it’s not allowed, Msa”c faces once knew them Ac”f by indiscriminate, non-hairs woman and is going to pay a head Dlcn this is permitted, and KosiitcGemara is not understood, dummy immaterial whether this hair herself or her friend, he knew the main thing Hair Cut ] If you cut the gate [of the woman herself] It’s like exchange of beast, [even prohibiting allowed to make a wig] if she cuts her hair she could make a wig, “[that does not interfere with the beauty of the wig but disturbing fact that it is impossible to know If she goes wild Prime or] (the borrower) Rebbe says wigs that today this street prohibitions that go? (And the rabbi replied) “I’m not saying all of them!” [ie – a wig obviously she wig – is permissible, and want to emphasize that there are many facets of the considerable ] (question) I ask the Talmud time as wigs wigs were the worst [beautiful =] most of the day because the wig Gemara did expect a woman who has a nice gate, and even imagine themselves “?
[Cdmoch Benazir C”h husband can not violate nuns wife, saying he would like to shave because you could wigs that is not a drop beauty] in response to which he replied with RavElyashiv a difference in the Gemara and some of these wigs nowadays. “But it was evident, but the faces of the day it really lewdness, it looks like the gate itself and there is no immaterial [= It looks like the cover of its connected without any difference, in other words – a wig pretty permitted, provided that they can recognize it cover slip, and not to be mistaken think wild Head] and it is not permitted permitted then the wig “RavElyashiv ruled decisively. The student did not give up and continued to make it difficult,” goes the Jewish religion? Leave without written ?! “. (And the rabbi replied)” Yes, “answered decisively RavElyashiv, the student dared to ask again:” Yes ?! “. And RavElyashiv responded: “The excuse is when the husband acting properly … If the husband is as well as it …,”. (Question) “Kosher Jews must divorce his wife when he goes wigs like that? “(And the rabbi replied)” He did not have to divorce her, he has to tell her not to go that way. “[Meaning – even when his wife was wearing a wig that looks prime real wild with it, do not fight with it, but only to explain it.]